Dear developers and EPW users
I wanted to calculate " resistivity Vs T " as for Lead (Pd) example in documentation. I could reproduce the graph (Fig.5) for Pb as shown in the EPW website. However I have few problems to apply the given python script to my own system. I appreciate your guidance for this.
I am not clear what are below terms in the python script given by Prof. Ponce means?
Line 16 : rhoaum = 2.2999241E6 ; What this value is ?
Line 28 : a2F_tr(1) = \omega in meV from 0-10 meV ; what this does?
Line 43 : resistivity.append(196.1075/2)*(pi/T)*int*(1/rhoaum)*1E8); ; What is 196.1075/2 in this line ?
What I basically wanted to know is to identify system dependent changes needs to be done before apply this script for my system (U3Si)?
Thank you
Inoka
Calculating electrical resistivity with Eliashberg spectral
Moderator: stiwari
Re: Calculating electrical resistivity with Eliashberg spec
Dear Inoka,
If I remember correctly,
1) rhoaum is to go from atomic unit to resistivity in Ohm.
2) Just a comment. Might not be relevant
3) 196.1075 should be the volume of the primitive cell in atomic unit.
You probably only need to change the volume and the alpha_2F_tr to your system to make it work.
Best,
Samuel
If I remember correctly,
1) rhoaum is to go from atomic unit to resistivity in Ohm.
2) Just a comment. Might not be relevant
3) 196.1075 should be the volume of the primitive cell in atomic unit.
You probably only need to change the volume and the alpha_2F_tr to your system to make it work.
Best,
Samuel
Prof. Samuel Poncé
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com
Re: Calculating electrical resistivity with Eliashberg spec
Dear Dr. Ponce
Thank you for your reply.
Yes. Since Pb is fcc (4 atoms in unit cell) and celldm(1)=9.2225583816 as per the given input scf.in , 196.1075 ~ (9.2225583816^3)/4. This can be the volume of primitive unitcell.
However, I am little bit confused about how volume come to the calculation. If I am correct, this calculation is done according to the Eqn. 54 in your paper "EPW: Electron-phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions".
If that equation is compared with line 43 in resistivity.py, only possibility is 4*electron_mass/(n * k_B* (electron_charge^2)) should give that constant ? Could you please verify this.
I couldn't find what this "n" means in the equation 54.
I am sorry that I have one more question. What are the 11 columns in a2f_tr.01 ?
I appreciate your support very much.
Have a successful year !!
Inoka
Thank you for your reply.
Yes. Since Pb is fcc (4 atoms in unit cell) and celldm(1)=9.2225583816 as per the given input scf.in , 196.1075 ~ (9.2225583816^3)/4. This can be the volume of primitive unitcell.
However, I am little bit confused about how volume come to the calculation. If I am correct, this calculation is done according to the Eqn. 54 in your paper "EPW: Electron-phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions".
If that equation is compared with line 43 in resistivity.py, only possibility is 4*electron_mass/(n * k_B* (electron_charge^2)) should give that constant ? Could you please verify this.
I couldn't find what this "n" means in the equation 54.
I am sorry that I have one more question. What are the 11 columns in a2f_tr.01 ?
I appreciate your support very much.
Have a successful year !!
Inoka
Re: Calculating electrical resistivity with Eliashberg spec
Dear S.Ponce
I tested the resistivity calculation by using the python script with Aluminum taking the unit cell volume (108.97 Bohr^3)). Its unit cell is ~ 4 Angstrom. But then the resistivity is more than twice big compare to experimental values. I am not sure why this happens. May I know how can I check where the error is ?
Thank you in Advance
Inoka
I tested the resistivity calculation by using the python script with Aluminum taking the unit cell volume (108.97 Bohr^3)). Its unit cell is ~ 4 Angstrom. But then the resistivity is more than twice big compare to experimental values. I am not sure why this happens. May I know how can I check where the error is ?
Thank you in Advance
Inoka