Validity of impurity scattering for 2D materials
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2023 9:42 am
Dear developers,
I have a doubt regarding the impurity scattering implementation and its validity for 2D materials/systems.
As I see from the code, the matrix elements for such transitions are computed by "rgd_imp_epw_fine" within "rigid_epw.f90" using a bare 3D Coulomb potential, namely "(4*pi*Z*e^2)/(eps_inf*q^2)*U_{n,k}*U_{m,k+q}". Threrefore, I guess that it is not valid for 2D materials as electrostatics differs. Is that the case? If so, for it to be valid for 2D materials, would it be as easy as to do like in "rgd_blk" and similar subroutines (i.e. the 2D electrostatics IF clauses)?
Best regards,
Martà Raya Moreno
I have a doubt regarding the impurity scattering implementation and its validity for 2D materials/systems.
As I see from the code, the matrix elements for such transitions are computed by "rgd_imp_epw_fine" within "rigid_epw.f90" using a bare 3D Coulomb potential, namely "(4*pi*Z*e^2)/(eps_inf*q^2)*U_{n,k}*U_{m,k+q}". Threrefore, I guess that it is not valid for 2D materials as electrostatics differs. Is that the case? If so, for it to be valid for 2D materials, would it be as easy as to do like in "rgd_blk" and similar subroutines (i.e. the 2D electrostatics IF clauses)?
Best regards,
Martà Raya Moreno