Nesting function
Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2016 7:00 am
Dear Samuel and Carla,
I am interested in the nesting function in EPW. From its formula, the calculation is dependent only on the band structure. Is it possible to set up for EPW calculate nesting function without any prior calculation such as electron-phonon coupling? I try to set elph=.false. but epw returns nothing in the output.
In addition, the nesting function defined in EPW is not really representative for the Fermi surface nesting characteristic. The static bare susceptibility is a better parameter to consider the mechanism of the nesting vector. (Equation 1 and 2 in http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10 ... .77.165135 and page 2 in the first paragraph http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103 ... 106.196406).
I saw the similar topic in the forum viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77&p=315&hilit=static+bare+susceptibility#p315. A simple set g=1 in the self_elph.f90 is not bring to the static bare susceptibility. Could you give me some hints to modify the code to calcualate this physical parameter?
With many thanks,
Loc
I am interested in the nesting function in EPW. From its formula, the calculation is dependent only on the band structure. Is it possible to set up for EPW calculate nesting function without any prior calculation such as electron-phonon coupling? I try to set elph=.false. but epw returns nothing in the output.
In addition, the nesting function defined in EPW is not really representative for the Fermi surface nesting characteristic. The static bare susceptibility is a better parameter to consider the mechanism of the nesting vector. (Equation 1 and 2 in http://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10 ... .77.165135 and page 2 in the first paragraph http://journals.aps.org/prl/pdf/10.1103 ... 106.196406).
I saw the similar topic in the forum viewtopic.php?f=3&t=77&p=315&hilit=static+bare+susceptibility#p315. A simple set g=1 in the self_elph.f90 is not bring to the static bare susceptibility. Could you give me some hints to modify the code to calcualate this physical parameter?
With many thanks,
Loc