How to obtain contributions of different phonon modes to carrier scattering
Posted: Tue Nov 03, 2020 1:56 am
Hi everyone:
Recently, I noticed the underlying mechanism of carrier mobility. It can be well understood by contributions of different phonon modes to carrier scattering (or mode-resolved scattering rates) published in Nano Lett. (2019, 19, 1774-1781, Dimensional Crossover in the Carrier Mobility of Two-Dimensional Semiconductors: The Case of InSe). The authors, in their work, employed the EPW code to deal with the issue. However, I try to obtain mode-resolved scattering rates by changing input parameters or modifying the source code but ultimately failed.
I followed someone's suggestion 'set the keyword "iverbosity = 3' in my EPW input file, but the results did not show anything related to the mode-resolved scattering rates. I also changed the transport.f90 in the SCR folder, and each mode's contribution can be output separately. As a result, both methods can't achieve the desired effect.
Can anybody know how to get the mode-resolved scattering rates excellently?
Recently, I noticed the underlying mechanism of carrier mobility. It can be well understood by contributions of different phonon modes to carrier scattering (or mode-resolved scattering rates) published in Nano Lett. (2019, 19, 1774-1781, Dimensional Crossover in the Carrier Mobility of Two-Dimensional Semiconductors: The Case of InSe). The authors, in their work, employed the EPW code to deal with the issue. However, I try to obtain mode-resolved scattering rates by changing input parameters or modifying the source code but ultimately failed.
I followed someone's suggestion 'set the keyword "iverbosity = 3' in my EPW input file, but the results did not show anything related to the mode-resolved scattering rates. I also changed the transport.f90 in the SCR folder, and each mode's contribution can be output separately. As a result, both methods can't achieve the desired effect.
Can anybody know how to get the mode-resolved scattering rates excellently?