Hello all,
I'd like to ask about the convergence of the scattering rates wrt # q points and broadening parameter (\eta).
From Fig. S2(a) of Ponce et al., Phys. Rev. B 97, 121201(R) (2018), I understand that the scattering rates (where the mobility is plotted) will diverge as the \eta approaches zero (I suppose for each data point in that figure, the # q points is large enough). On contrary, according to Zhou et al., PRB 94, 201201(R) (2016), by decreasing the \eta and increasing the # q points, the scattering rates will eventually become converged, i.e., the \eta->0 limit exists.
I fee like these two arguments are very different. Could you please help me clarify? Thanks.
Hyuan
Convergence wrt # q points and broadening parameter
Moderator: stiwari
Re: Convergence wrt # q points and broadening parameter
Dear Hyuan,
Thank you for your question.
The Fig.S2 in my paper is done at fixed fine k and q interpolated grids.
If instead you increase the k/q grids when you decrease the smearing, it should indeed converge.
I think that the \eta->0 limit exists for a grid density -> infinity.
Best wishes,
Samuel
Thank you for your question.
The Fig.S2 in my paper is done at fixed fine k and q interpolated grids.
If instead you increase the k/q grids when you decrease the smearing, it should indeed converge.
I think that the \eta->0 limit exists for a grid density -> infinity.
Best wishes,
Samuel
Prof. Samuel Poncé
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com
Re: Convergence wrt # q points and broadening parameter
Dear Samuel,
Thank you for your explaination.
Best regards,
Hyuan
Thank you for your explaination.
Best regards,
Hyuan