Dear EPW developers,
Regarding lifc, the documentation says " In the case of SOC, the file must be named “ifc.q2r.xml” and be in xml format".
In my SOC calculation, I didn't set the dynamical files to be in xml format by fildyn='dyn' (not fildyn='dyn.xml'), and the atomic force file is also not in the xml format.
But in the following epw calculation, it runs smoothly without any error message.
So how do I understand the "must" ? Does it means that the final results may not be reliable though it runs smoothly ?
Please leave a comment , I'm in a confusion now.
Best regards,
jqHuang
dyn and ifc format in the case of SOC
Moderator: stiwari
Re: dyn and ifc format in the case of SOC
Dear jqHuang:
Regarding the xml issue:
I think that the documentation is out of date and you don't need to worry about it.
Please check the following post with my reply:
viewtopic.php?p=3192#p3192
Sincerely,
H. Lee
Regarding the xml issue:
I think that the documentation is out of date and you don't need to worry about it.
Please check the following post with my reply:
viewtopic.php?p=3192#p3192
Sincerely,
H. Lee
Re: dyn and ifc format in the case of SOC
Dear H. Lee,
Thank you, sir, for your kindly reply.
Yes. I checked the relevent post and the source code of io_epw.f90 and dynmat_asr.f90.
Compared with old versions, QE6.5 added a subroutine "check_is_xml_file" to check either or not the file is formatted in xml.
So the xml requirment is no longer bound to SOC calculation.
Now I am relieved ! Thanks again !
Best regards,
jqHuang
Thank you, sir, for your kindly reply.
Yes. I checked the relevent post and the source code of io_epw.f90 and dynmat_asr.f90.
Compared with old versions, QE6.5 added a subroutine "check_is_xml_file" to check either or not the file is formatted in xml.
So the xml requirment is no longer bound to SOC calculation.
Now I am relieved ! Thanks again !
Best regards,
jqHuang