Regarding nk* and nq*

Post here questions linked with issue while running the EPW code

Moderator: stiwari

appalakondaiah
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:45 am
Affiliation:

Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by appalakondaiah »

Dear Admin,

I am running the bulk MX2 compounds and facing below error with epw.out. can you please suggest me the possible suggesition for further

Error in routine wigner_seitz (1):
weights do not add up to nk1*nk2*nk3
nkf1 = 6
nkf2 = 6
nkf3 = 4

nqf1 = 6
nqf2 = 6
nqf3 = 4

nk1 = 6
nk2 = 6
nk3 = 4

nq1 = 6
nq2 = 6
nq3 = 4
/
21 cartesian
0.000000000000000E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
0.000000000000000E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
0.000000000000000E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000
0.944289008412737E-01 0.163555653804091E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
0.944289008412737E-01 0.163555653804091E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
0.944289008412737E-01 0.163555653804091E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000
0.188857801682547E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
0.188857801682547E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
0.188857801682547E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000
-0.283286702523821E+00 -0.490666961412273E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
-0.283286702523821E+00 -0.490666961412273E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
-0.283286702523821E+00 -0.490666961412273E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000
0.283286702338488E+00 0.163555653804091E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
0.283286702338488E+00 0.163555653804091E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
0.283286702338488E+00 0.163555653804091E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000
0.377715603179762E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
0.377715603179762E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
0.377715603179762E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000
0.566573404676977E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 0.000000000000000E+00 1.0000000
0.566573404676977E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 0.618359692346929E-01 1.0000000
0.566573404676977E+00 0.327111307608182E+00 -0.123671938469386E+00 1.0000000

appalakondaiah
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:45 am
Affiliation:

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by appalakondaiah »

Dear all,

As I continuing the previous post, I am requesting the possible solution for my error in epw calculations.

My Phonon calculations did with 24X24X8 Kmesh for SCF and 6X6X4 q-mesh for frequencies. I also follow same for epw-scf (24X24X8) and epw-nscf (216 Kpoints with 6X6X4 grid).

Error in routine wigner_seitz (1):
weights do not add up to nk1*nk2*nk3


Thanks in advance

with regards

sponce
Site Admin
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:25 pm
Affiliation: EPFL

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by sponce »

Hello,

Can you show us your scf.in and nscf.in input file? Especially the k-point grid that you used.

Best,

Samuel
Prof. Samuel Poncé
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com

appalakondaiah
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:45 am
Affiliation:

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by appalakondaiah »

Dear Prof. Samuel,

Below I am giving the K-mesh details. Since, I did my phonons with 6X6X4 grid, I used the same grid in epw-nscf.in Kpoints by generating the utility of wannier90 (kmesh.pl)

epw-scf.in
K_POINTS automatic
24 24 8 0 0 0
epw-nscf.in
K_POINTS crystal
144
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.50000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.75000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.16666667 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.16666667 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.16666667 0.50000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.16666667 0.75000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.33333333 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.33333333 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.33333333 0.50000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.33333333 0.75000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.50000000 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.50000000 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.50000000 0.50000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.50000000 0.75000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.66666667 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.66666667 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.66666667 0.50000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.66666667 0.75000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.83333333 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.83333333 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.83333333 0.50000000 6.944444e-03
0.00000000 0.83333333 0.75000000 6.944444e-03
0.16666667 0.00000000 0.00000000 6.944444e-03
0.16666667 0.00000000 0.25000000 6.944444e-03
-----
----
--

with regards
S. Appalakondaiah

sponce
Site Admin
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:25 pm
Affiliation: EPFL

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by sponce »

Hello,

I'm afraid I really don't have much suggestion. This is quite weird.
Maybe try with a different grid to see if the problem persists.

Best,

Samuel
Prof. Samuel Poncé
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com

appalakondaiah
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:45 am
Affiliation:

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by appalakondaiah »

Dear Prof. Samuel,


I changed the phonon grid and try to check epw calculations. Still I am facing the same error, which I am showing below. Kindly suggest me the possible way!!!


The .epb files have been correctly written


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Error in routine wigner_seitz (1):
weights do not add up to nk1*nk2*nk3
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

appalakondaiah
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:45 am
Affiliation:

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by appalakondaiah »

Dear all,

I am running the epw calculations for Bulk MX2 compounds and facing the below error for various sets of kpoint and qpoints grids.

===================================================================
irreducible q point # 14
===================================================================

Symmetries of small group of q: 12

Number of q in the star = 2
List of q in the star:
1 0.566573405 0.327111308 -0.123671938
2 -0.566573405 -0.327111308 0.123671938

q( 71 ) = ( 0.5665734 0.3271113 -0.1236719 )
q( 72 ) = ( -0.5665734 -0.3271113 0.1236719 )

Writing epmatq on .epb files


The .epb files have been correctly written


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Error in routine wigner_seitz (1):
weights do not add up to nk1*nk2*nk3
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


Here with I am attaching all my inputs for phonon and epw calculations and kindly suggest me the possible way. Thanks in advance

Phonons-scf
&CONTROL
calculation = "scf",
pseudo_dir = "/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/Pseudo",
outdir = "/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/TMP/WS2/Phonons/Ground",
prefix='WS2'
tstress =.true.
tprnfor =.true.
etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-8
forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-6

/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 0
A= 3.153200
nat = 6
ntyp = 2
ecutwfc =90
degauss=.005,
smearing='mp'
occupations='smearing',
input_dft='vdw-df2'
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-10
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
S 32.065 S.pz-bhs.UPF
W 183.84 W.pz-bhs.UPF
CELL_PARAMETERS (alat= 5.95868444)
0.882498183 -0.509510564 0.000000000
-0.000000000 1.019021127 0.000000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 4.042954337
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
S 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.629080401
S 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.870919599
S 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.129080401
S 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.370919599
W 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.250000000
W 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.750000000
K_POINTS automatic
24 24 8 0 0 0

Phonons
Phonons of WS2
&inputph
tr2_ph=1.0d-15,
alpha_mix = 0.3,
prefix='$NAME',
outdir='$TMP',
ldisp=.true.,
fildvscf = 'dvscf'
fildyn='$NAME.dyn',
nq1=6, nq2=6, nq3=2
/

epw-scf.in

&CONTROL
calculation = "scf",
pseudo_dir = "/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/Pseudo",
outdir = "/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/TMP/WS2/Phonons/Ground/epw",
wf_collect = .true.
prefix='WS2'
tstress =.true.
tprnfor =.true.
etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-8
forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-6

/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 0
A= 3.153200
nat = 6
ntyp = 2
ecutwfc =90
degauss=.005,
smearing='mp'
occupations='smearing',
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-10
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
S 32.065 S.pz-bhs.UPF
W 183.84 W.pz-bhs.UPF
CELL_PARAMETERS (alat= 5.95868444)
0.882498183 -0.509510564 0.000000000
-0.000000000 1.019021127 0.000000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 4.042954337
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
S 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.629080401
S 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.870919599
S 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.129080401
S 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.370919599
W 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.250000000
W 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.750000000
K_POINTS automatic
24 24 8 0 0 0
epw-nscf
&CONTROL
calculation = "scf",
pseudo_dir = "/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/Pseudo",
outdir = "/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/TMP/WS2/Phonons/Ground/epw",
prefix='WS2'
tstress =.true.
tprnfor =.true.
wf_collect = .true.
etot_conv_thr = 1.0D-8
forc_conv_thr = 1.0D-6

/
&SYSTEM
ibrav = 0
A= 3.153200
nat = 6
ntyp = 2
ecutwfc =90
degauss=.005,
smearing='mp'
occupations='smearing',
/
&electrons
conv_thr = 1.0d-10
/
ATOMIC_SPECIES
S 32.065 S.pz-bhs.UPF
W 183.84 W.pz-bhs.UPF
CELL_PARAMETERS (alat= 5.95868444)
0.882498183 -0.509510564 0.000000000
-0.000000000 1.019021127 0.000000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 4.042954337
ATOMIC_POSITIONS (crystal)
S 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.629080401
S 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.870919599
S 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.129080401
S 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.370919599
W 0.333333333 0.666666667 0.250000000
W 0.666666667 0.333333333 0.750000000
K_POINTS crystal
72
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.00000000 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.16666667 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.16666667 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.33333333 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.33333333 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.50000000 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.50000000 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.66666667 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.66666667 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.83333333 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.00000000 0.83333333 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.16666667 0.00000000 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
0.16666667 0.00000000 0.50000000 1.388889e-02
0.16666667 0.16666667 0.00000000 1.388889e-02
------
-----
------

epw.in

--
&inputepw
prefix = 'WS2'
amass(1) = 32.05,
amass(2) = 183.84,
outdir = '/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/TMP/WS2/Phonons/Ground/epw/'

iverbosity = 0

elph = .true.
epbwrite = .true.
epbread = .false.

etf_mem = .false.

epwwrite = .true.
epwread = .false.

nbndsub = 22
wannierize = .true.
num_iter = 100
proj(1) = 'S:l=1'
proj(2) = 'W:l=2'
dis_win_min = -1.0
dis_froz_min = 8.0
dis_froz_max = 9.0
dis_win_max = 12.0
wdata(1) = 'bands_plot = .true.'
wdata(2) = 'begin kpoint_path'
wdata(3) = 'G 0.00 0.00 0.00 M 0.50 0.00 0.00'
wdata(4) = 'M 0.50 0.00 0.00 K 0.33 0.33 0.00'
wdata(5) = 'K 0.33 0.33 0.00 G 0.00 0.00 0.00'
wdata(6) = 'G 0.00 0.00 0.00 A 0.00 0.00 0.50'
wdata(7) = 'A 0.00 0.00 0.50 L 0.50 0.00 0.50'
wdata(8) = 'L 0.50 0.00 0.50 H 0.33 0.33 0.50'
wdata(9) = 'end kpoint_path'
wdata(10) = 'bands_plot_format = xmgr'
wdata(11) = 'guiding_centres = TRUE '

elecselfen = .true.
phonselfen = .true.
a2f = .false.

parallel_k = .true.
parallel_q = .false.


fsthick = 4.0 ! eV
eptemp = 300 ! K (same as PRB 76, 165108)
degaussw = 0.06802849 ! eV


dvscf_dir = '/home/konda/Work/PWSCF/TMP/WS2/Phonons/Ground/save'
filukk = './WS2.ukk'

nkf1 = 6
nkf2 = 6
nkf3 = 2

nqf1 = 6
nqf2 = 6
nqf3 = 2

nk1 = 6
nk2 = 6
nk3 = 2

nq1 = 6
nq2 = 6
nq3 = 2

/
14 cartesian
0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000 1.0000000
0.000000000 0.000000000 -0.123671938 1.0000000
0.094428901 0.163555654 0.000000000 1.0000000
0.094428901 0.163555654 -0.123671938 1.0000000
0.188857802 0.327111308 0.000000000 1.0000000
0.188857802 0.327111308 -0.123671938 1.0000000
-0.283286703 -0.490666961 0.000000000 1.0000000
-0.283286703 -0.490666961 -0.123671938 1.0000000
0.283286702 0.163555654 0.000000000 1.0000000
0.283286702 0.163555654 -0.123671938 1.0000000
0.377715603 0.327111308 0.000000000 1.0000000
0.377715603 0.327111308 -0.123671938 1.0000000
0.566573405 0.327111308 0.000000000 1.0000000
0.566573405 0.327111308 -0.123671938 1.0000000

appalakondaiah
Posts: 30
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2016 11:45 am
Affiliation:

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by appalakondaiah »

Dear Admin/all

Can any one suggest the possible solution for my previous query!!! Thanks in advance

with regards
S. Appalakondaiah

sponce
Site Admin
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:25 pm
Affiliation: EPFL

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by sponce »

Dear appalakondaiah,

You can have a look in the routine "appalakondaiah".

This routine was originally taken from the Wannier90 code.

This routines tries to find the Wigner size points. In the case of a very distorted cell (also 2D materials like your could be problematic),
the routines has troube finding all of them.

At the moment it looks in a supercells from -2,2 times the primitive cell. This means 5^3=125 times more. In practice it is from 0,4 which is equivalent.

You can increase this (will be slower) to for example 0,6 (equivalent to -3,3). You will therefore have 7^3 times more.

Note that "63" is the middle of 125 and is hardcoded so you will need to adapt it if you change it.

Hope this helps,

Best,
Samuel
Prof. Samuel Poncé
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com

ywchoi
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 2:51 pm
Affiliation:

Re: Regarding nk* and nq*

Post by ywchoi »

I encountered the same problem when calculating graphene using EPW.
EPW dies at wigner_seitz.f90 saying
weights do not add up to nk1*nk2*nk3


But, this problem can be fixed by using less restrictive value of epsilon at the line 132 in wigner_seitz.f90

Code: Select all

DO while ( abs(dist(i)-mindist).le.eps7 .and. i.lt.125 )


, where eps7 = 1.0e-7_dp.

I found this fix by looking the source of wannier90.x; hamiltonian_wigner_seitz subroutine in hamiltonian.F90.
But I am not sure why this works.

Thank you.

Post Reply