Error: examine the output/error file for details

Post here questions linked with issue while running the EPW code

Moderator: stiwari

Post Reply
Linu

Error: examine the output/error file for details

Post by Linu »

Hi

I am getting following error in the final epw calculation

Running Wannier90
dis_main: problem in ZGESVD 1
Error: examine the output/error file for details


Is this a hardware problem or a problem with my input file

Can you please help me solve this.

Thank you

epw.out

MMN
k points = 216 in 16 pools
1 of 14 on ionode
2 of 14 on ionode
3 of 14 on ionode
4 of 14 on ionode
5 of 14 on ionode
6 of 14 on ionode
7 of 14 on ionode
8 of 14 on ionode
9 of 14 on ionode
10 of 14 on ionode
11 of 14 on ionode
12 of 14 on ionode
13 of 14 on ionode
14 of 14 on ionode
MMN calculated

Running Wannier90
dis_main: problem in ZGESVD 1
Error: examine the output/error file for details



regards

Linu

sponce
Site Admin
Posts: 616
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 7:25 pm
Affiliation: EPFL

Re: Error: examine the output/error file for details

Post by sponce »

Dear Linu,

I'm afraid this is a problem of the Wannier90 code. Indeed EPW does not use ZGESVD.

The problem is in wannier90-2.0.1/src/disentangle.F90

You might want to print all the variable just before entering

Code: Select all

         call ZGESVD ('A', 'A', num_wann, num_wann, caa(:,:,nkp), num_wann, &
              svals, cz, num_wann, cv, num_wann, cwork, 4*num_wann, rwork, info)


to see which one is at fault.

Best,

Samuel
Prof. Samuel Poncé
Chercheur qualifié F.R.S.-FNRS / Professeur UCLouvain
Institute of Condensed Matter and Nanosciences
UCLouvain, Belgium
Web: https://www.samuelponce.com

tswang
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2016 1:40 am
Affiliation:

Re: Error: examine the output/error file for details

Post by tswang »

Hi,

I had the similar error.

1. You can run the test examples, and see if it works.
2. If it works, then check your pseudopotential of your failed run. EPW doesn't support PAW PseudoPotential type.

I was using PAW pseodopotential for Si, and it works. But if I use PAW seodopotentials for SiC, and I would find the same mistake as yours.

Post Reply