Hi,
I noticed that all listed q-points have 0.0 as the component along x-axis. This doesn't seem correct for a 6x6x6 q-mesh.
Best,
Roxana
Search found 172 matches
- Tue Jun 28, 2016 9:06 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: MPIRUN errors
- Replies: 18
- Views: 16930
- Wed Jun 22, 2016 7:52 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Printing/plotting g coefficients (and: restarting a calc)
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14581
Re: Printing/plotting g coefficients (and: restarting a calc
Dear Vahid,
The loop over ik should be "DO ik = 1, nksqtotf" same as when Sigma is written to file.
Best,
Roxana
The loop over ik should be "DO ik = 1, nksqtotf" same as when Sigma is written to file.
Best,
Roxana
- Wed Jun 15, 2016 1:12 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: EPW to calculate anisotropic superconducting gap of MgB2
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5175
Re: EPW to calculate anisotropic superconducting gap of MgB2
Dear Cai, I would advise that you try to reproduce the results from the test directory EPW/tests/Refs/t05/paral The input parameters won't give you converged results, but you can directly check your output files with the references given. The input files are located in EPW/tests/Inputs/t05 Best, Rox...
- Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:15 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: epw input in the presence of electric field
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5143
Re: epw input in the presence of electric field
Dear Ali, I found the following paragraph in QE user guide, where it is stated that ph.x code doesn't work with external electric fields. "The main code ph.x can be used whenever PWscf can be used, with the exceptions of: DFT+U, semiempirical VdW corrections, nonlocal vdW and hybrid functionals...
- Sun Jun 12, 2016 7:56 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: epw input in the presence of electric field
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5143
Re: epw input in the presence of electric field
Dear Ali,
mp_mesh_k = .true. flag implies that symmetry is used in order to find the irreducible k-points.
You can try to see if removing this flag helps. However, I should point out that EPW has not been tested for a QE calculation in the presence of an electric field.
Best,
Roxana
mp_mesh_k = .true. flag implies that symmetry is used in order to find the irreducible k-points.
You can try to see if removing this flag helps. However, I should point out that EPW has not been tested for a QE calculation in the presence of an electric field.
Best,
Roxana
- Fri May 06, 2016 9:17 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Error:coarse k-mesh needs to be strictly positive in 1st BZ
- Replies: 17
- Views: 16651
Re: Error:coarse k-mesh needs to be strictly positive in 1st
Hi,
You need to make sure that the coarse k-mesh provided in the nscf calculation is strictly positive (x, y, and z components of each k point must be positive).
Best,
Roxana
You need to make sure that the coarse k-mesh provided in the nscf calculation is strictly positive (x, y, and z components of each k point must be positive).
Best,
Roxana
- Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:31 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Wrong qpoint for 2D phosphorene
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5498
Re: Wrong qpoint for 2D phosphorene
Dear Vahid,
You need to make sure that you provide the exact same list of q-points as during the phonon calculations.
If everything match, it should work.
Best,
Roxana
You need to make sure that you provide the exact same list of q-points as during the phonon calculations.
If everything match, it should work.
Best,
Roxana
- Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:15 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Wrong qpoint for 2D phosphorene
- Replies: 4
- Views: 5498
Re: Wrong qpoint for 2D phosphorene
Dear Vahid,
Did you generate the q-points in the same way when you did the phonon calculations to extract the dynamical matrices and deformation potential?
Best,
Roxana
Did you generate the q-points in the same way when you did the phonon calculations to extract the dynamical matrices and deformation potential?
Best,
Roxana
- Sun Apr 03, 2016 10:59 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Increase of accuracy
- Replies: 14
- Views: 13314
Re: Increase of accuracy
Dear Ali, The number is column for needs to be divided by 512 (the total number of points). To check this use my first suggestion and run a scf calculations. I would also recommend that for questions related to QE you consult the QE tutorials and forum where you can find answers to many questions/pr...
- Sun Apr 03, 2016 4:08 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Increase of accuracy
- Replies: 14
- Views: 13314
Re: Increase of accuracy
Hi Ali,
You can simply run a scf calculations with your desired q-mesh and the coordinate and weight of each points is listed after "number of k points" line.
As an alternative you can use kpoints.f90 program that is provided in QE/PW/tools.
Best,
Roxana
You can simply run a scf calculations with your desired q-mesh and the coordinate and weight of each points is listed after "number of k points" line.
As an alternative you can use kpoints.f90 program that is provided in QE/PW/tools.
Best,
Roxana