Hi,
You need to converge lambda with both k and q meshes. This is not very easily done in QE since the k and q meshes used are in general pretty coarse.
Best,
Roxana
Search found 172 matches
- Tue Jun 27, 2023 9:59 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Different Tc obtained in EPW and lambda.x calculation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 21638
- Tue Jun 27, 2023 9:50 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: lambda___( 1 )=***************
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3047
Re: lambda___( 1 )=***************
Hi, The *** means that not enough digits are printed. Currently, the format in selfen.f90 if f15.6. You can change this to more digits. However, the values that you are getting appear too large. selfen.f90: 104 FORMAT(5x, 'lambda_tr( ',i3,' )=', f15.6, ' gamma_tr=', f15.6, ' meV', ' omega=', f12.4 ...
- Tue Jun 27, 2023 2:03 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
- Replies: 6
- Views: 16263
Re: forrtl: severe (174): SIGSEGV, segmentation fault occurred
Hi,
Can you please also use the latest released version 5.7?
Best,
Roxana
Can you please also use the latest released version 5.7?
Best,
Roxana
- Tue Jun 27, 2023 1:24 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: dielectric tensors in phonon calculation using the QE
- Replies: 1
- Views: 22021
Re: dielectric tensors in phonon calculation using the QE
Hi,
Please post questions about QE on the QE forum.
Best,
Roxana
Please post questions about QE on the QE forum.
Best,
Roxana
- Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:22 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Negative value of superconducting gap
- Replies: 13
- Views: 43637
Re: Negative value of superconducting gap
Hi,
Larger the \mu* value stronger the Coulomb effect and therefore smaller the Tc and gap.
Best,
Roxana
Larger the \mu* value stronger the Coulomb effect and therefore smaller the Tc and gap.
Best,
Roxana
- Wed Jun 07, 2023 4:01 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: EPW code v5.7 polaron calculation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 4506
Re: EPW code v5.7 polaron calculation
Hi,
You can find a tutorial with input file under the "Hands-on tutorial: Polarons" at the link below:
https://epw2023.dryfta.com/74-schedule
Best,
Roxana
You can find a tutorial with input file under the "Hands-on tutorial: Polarons" at the link below:
https://epw2023.dryfta.com/74-schedule
Best,
Roxana
- Wed Jun 07, 2023 3:55 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Negative value of superconducting gap
- Replies: 13
- Views: 43637
Re: Negative value of superconducting gap
Hi Shubham,
I would recommend running calculations with different \mu* values starting from \mu*=0 and see at which value the lower gap becomes negative.
Best,
Roxana
I would recommend running calculations with different \mu* values starting from \mu*=0 and see at which value the lower gap becomes negative.
Best,
Roxana
- Wed Jun 07, 2023 3:42 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Printing complex electron-phonon matrix elements after interpolation
- Replies: 1
- Views: 7593
Re: Printing complex electron-phonon matrix elements after interpolation
Hi Rachel,
There is no flag to do this in the code. You can modify the subroutine where |g| is written to file.
Best,
Roxana
There is no flag to do this in the code. You can modify the subroutine where |g| is written to file.
Best,
Roxana
- Thu Mar 25, 2021 1:12 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Error in routine mix_broyden(1) :factorization
- Replies: 5
- Views: 9171
Re: Error in routine mix_broyden(1) :factorization
Hi,
I just noticed that the e-ph coupling strength in your output file is zero. It appears that something went wrong when reading a2f file. So check that the is correct.
"Electron-phonon coupling strength = 0.0000000"
Best,
Roxana
I just noticed that the e-ph coupling strength in your output file is zero. It appears that something went wrong when reading a2f file. So check that the is correct.
"Electron-phonon coupling strength = 0.0000000"
Best,
Roxana
- Fri Mar 05, 2021 3:19 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: about mu* pseudo potential
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5671
Re: about mu* pseudo potential
Hi,
You can vary mu* between 0.1 and 0.2 and see how Tc changes (most systems have mu* between these limits). As an alternative, you can estimate mu* for your system using Morel-Anderson expression.
Best regards,
Roxana
You can vary mu* between 0.1 and 0.2 and see how Tc changes (most systems have mu* between these limits). As an alternative, you can estimate mu* for your system using Morel-Anderson expression.
Best regards,
Roxana