Search found 3 matches
- Fri Feb 14, 2025 12:38 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Discrepancy between input and output Electronic Density
- Replies: 5
- Views: 44575
Re: Discrepancy between input and output Electronic Density
I also considered the possibility that the fsthick parameter was not large enough. To test this, I increased its value and observed the following behavior: with fsthick = 0.4, I obtained the same hole density as before; increasing it to 0.5 resulted in 0.227540E+21, and at 0.6, the hole density ...
- Fri Feb 07, 2025 12:16 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Discrepancy between input and output Electronic Density
- Replies: 5
- Views: 44575
Re: Discrepancy between input and output Electronic Density
Hi Sabya, Thank you very much for your reply. I tried to verify whether the discrepancy between the input and output hole density was due to reaching the maximum number of iterations, but this does not seem to be the case for two reasons. First, there is no "too many iterations in bisection" warning ...
- Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:34 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Discrepancy between input and output Electronic Density
- Replies: 5
- Views: 44575
Discrepancy between input and output Electronic Density
Dear all, In a mobility calculation, I set a specific carrier concentration (ncarrier), for example, -1.5E21(hole mobility). However, after the Progression iq (fine) step, the program prints the temperature, Fermi level, and hole density, but the reported hole density is 0.227147E+21 instead. I ...