Thank you very much!
Best,
Jun-Ho
Search found 5 matches
- Wed Jan 09, 2019 12:36 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Different values of lambda and Tc (iso vs aniso?)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8175
- Sat Jan 05, 2019 5:13 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Different values of lambda and Tc (iso vs aniso?)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8175
Re: Different values of lambda and Tc (iso vs aniso?)
Dear Roxana,
Thank you very much for your reply.
Does the significant difference between the calculated values of lambda obtained by two different methods mean that these are not converged results with respect to fine k- or q-grids?
Best regards,
Jun-Ho
Thank you very much for your reply.
Does the significant difference between the calculated values of lambda obtained by two different methods mean that these are not converged results with respect to fine k- or q-grids?
Best regards,
Jun-Ho
- Fri Jan 04, 2019 9:09 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Different values of lambda and Tc (iso vs aniso?)
- Replies: 7
- Views: 8175
Different values of lambda and Tc (iso vs aniso?)
Dear all, I am calculating lambda using two different methods implemented in EPW. First one is obtained by activating anisotropic Eliashberg equation related tags. eliashberg = .true. laniso = .true. limag = .true. lpade = .true. The result is as below ...
- Mon Apr 10, 2017 10:50 pm
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Unit of logarithmic average of phonon frequencies
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4327
Re: Unit of logarithmic average of phonon frequencies
Dear Roxana,
Thank you very much!
Best,
Jun-Ho
Thank you very much!
Best,
Jun-Ho
- Mon Apr 10, 2017 6:03 am
- Forum: Running the code
- Topic: Unit of logarithmic average of phonon frequencies
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4327
Unit of logarithmic average of phonon frequencies
Dear EPW users, I am interested in electron-phonon interaction in two dimensional materials to understand collective phenomena. Especially, I want to know the unit of logarithmic average of phonon frequencies in the output of epw, v.4.0.0. In the output file, logavg = 0.0003401 can be found without ...